Crossing The Floor

How is it possible to leave because of a fight between you and someone in the party or organization, when your goals are truly entrenched in its policies? And even more questionable, how do you leave the very intrinsic policies that made you different from the competition and crossover, only to adopt theirs? How is it possible to represent people using your competitor’s culture, the ones you so vehemently criticized?

 

Crossing The Floor

The struggle for power causes disloyalty

Honor swashed by obsessions and treachery

Evil overcomes otherwise good men

Struggling to become the top kingpin

Eager for power men commit inconsistencies

Grown men may switch their political parties

Renounce all of their distinct manifesto

Adopting a conflicting way to go

People misrepresent the reasons why

Even venture to deceive with a blatant lie

Someone in the hierarchy forced their hand

They made it impossible for them to stand

And we misguided want so hard to believe

Such actions were not meant to deceive

The unsuspecting constituents who gave their vote

Electorate who worked hard to promote

Shrouded in the deception of being deserted

Only because the quest for power corrupted

Unfaithful men with selfish desire

React this way but soon they expire

 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 18 Jan 2008, 6:22 AM Gary Cole aka Tatanka Yotanka wrote:
    Khaidji
    I never met you, and don't know of you, but i suppose you already know, and hear it a lot - you have a lot of talent, in fact a gift. I wish you all the best with your poetic and writing endeavours, but wish to say this, crossing political parties should be encouraged, and the more people who do it the better. People should not slavishly worship the power of the party because when the party takes power, especially in an emphatic victory, the party becomes the Nation, and politicians need to remember they serve the people not the party. So we need to get away from this party politics - its too destructive. The parties are just mechanisms to get into the House, what a Parliamentarian then does is a matter of his own conscience, and if the parliamantarians had more conscience, more of them would stand up on principle, and go against the party whip.
    Reply to this
    1. 18 Jan 2008, 7:17 AM Khaidji wrote:
      Gary

      Thanks for your compliments

      Although I understand your view and may accept that some circumstance would welcome this, I still wonder, What happens to core values if two parties seemingly conflict?

      See Other Poem on Crossing The Floor inspired by a caller to Brass Tacks in May 2007

      Reply to this
  • 22 Jan 2008, 9:28 AM Gary Cole aka Tatanka Yotanka wrote:
    Point taken, and every case should be taken on its merit, and nearly 100% of the times in Barbados, they cross for opportunistic motives...so the weight of evidence is with you...and what you say is true. But in Antigua where VC Bird ruled for nearly 40 years, this is amply illustrated, in the type of politics. Members broke with VC Bird, formed a rival political party, took power, lost power, and then returned to VC Birds Labour party, with open arms, like prodogal sons, and life is a lot better in Antigua for it.
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

We welcome your comments and will not share your information. We reserve the right to publish any comment which we moderate. During moderation some typo may be corrected but we do not deliberate attempt to edit your comments. Note lots of typos will be seen in the raw poetry and we invite you to draw them to our attention

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.