The Evidence Amendment
The Evidence
Amendment Act 2007 was voted on today. I wonder about all the implications that
come up internationally that were not discussed by the “honorable” House. There
has been much international talks about wiretapping and admissibility of phone
recordings since the 911 Terrorist scare that eavesdropping and bugging should
have been addressed in this Act. But maybe these things are dealt with
elsewhere
|
The Evidence Amendment There
was a motion in Parliament to amend How
we may present and defend Evidence
against an accused Encouraging
recordings to be used Video
is a recent technology Implemented
for greater accuracy Digital
tapes the court believes wouldn’t lie Except
if they are doctored by a Techi guy No
consideration was given for spying Cameras
installed stealth that are prying Eliciting
actions taken without context And
indulging us to guess what happened next My
concern is also one of confidentiality Electronically
violating ones privacy No
dissension came from within the House DLP
and BLP alike had no grouse Members
of this House conferred a vote to cast Evidence
Amendment Act 2007 was then past Now
police when interviewing suspects may record They
can video and audio tape with judicial accord |
Comments